Carlos F. Pino, the chauffer responsible for a deadly limousine accident, has been found guilty by a grand jury. The tragic accident took place on July 18, 2015. Eight women were coming home from a bridal party with Pino acting as their chauffer. He executed a U-turn on Route 48. Before he completed the turn, the limo was t-boned by a pickup driver. The truck struck the limo with so much force, the large car was very nearly sliced into two separate pieces. While investigating the incident, it was discovered that the driver of the truck, Steven Romeo, had been drinking. He was later charged with a misdemeanor charge of driving while intoxicated. He’s not being held criminally responsible for the accident.
The reason Pino was charged with a crime even though he hadn’t been drinking stemmed from the fact that the investigation revealed that he chose to make the turn despite the fact that there was an SUV directly in front of him, hindering his ability to see, as well as the fact he failed to make a complete stop prior to executing the turn.
The reason Romeo wasn’t held accountable for the deaths of the women stemmed from the fact that Pino turned directly in front of him. Even completely sober, he wouldn’t have been able to avoid the accident.
The charges against Pino included failure to yield the right of way, criminally negligent homicide, reckless driving, and assault. Criminal charges might be just one of the problems that Pino faces. It’s likely that the immediate families of the women killed will choose to pursue a wrongful death civil case against the limo driver as well.
Legally speaking, a wrongful death lawsuit can be pursued whenever a person’s death was the result of a moment of negligence or a careless act committed by another party. The most common cause of wrongful deaths are auto accidents. Only immediate family members are allowed to file a wrongful death lawsuit. In an attempt to prevent the court system from becoming clogged up by wrongful death cases, many states have adapted statutes of limitations in wrongful death cases.
If you’re grieving the loss of a family member who you believed was wrongfully killed in a car accident, you will need the help of John Bales Attorneys a good auto accident lawyer. Your auto accident lawyer will help you file the lawsuit, investigating the exact details of the case, handle communication with all other parties, and make sure your rights are protected for as long as the case is open. Once you decide that you’re going to hire the services of an auto accident lawyer you need to cease all communications with the other people involved in the case.
The most important thing to remember when seeking the assistance of an auto accident lawyer is that they must have a great deal of experience with cases similar to yours and that they genuinely care about your case. Some of the lawyers with the most experience are johnbales.com.
CNN recently reported that the healthcare group Planned Parenthood has filed a lawsuit against the curiously named Center for Medical Progress. The group, who’s main focus has been an alleged “investigation” into the practices of the large women’s medical provider, released doctored videos that attempted to claim that Planned Parenthood made a profit selling human tissue. While it is clear that the CMP is working to discredit and defund Planned Parenthood—which it can legally do—how do their videos fall under personal injury law?
This is where defamation law comes in. There are two basic types of defamation, slander and libel. Slander is generally thought of as malicious gossip—it’s spread verbally. The latter type, libel, deals with publication of false facts in an attempt to cause malice. Publication can include written documentation like newspaper ads and tracts, as well as videos, photographs, and comics. Because libel is published in this manner, a plaintiff is not required to show that it occurred—the libel is publicly available and has clearly occurred.
To show malice, Planned Parenthood’s personal injury attorneys would need to prove to a judge or jury that the defendant, the Center for Medical Progress, knowingly created videos with false information meant to harm Planned Parenthood or that they created videos with false information that would have been proven false had they bothered to check. CNN and other news outlets have debunked the findings from the videos, however it appears negative press from the videos may have harmed Planned Parenthood’s reputation. If a judge or jury finds this is the case, perhaps by considering public opinion polls for or against Planned Parenthood’s funding or congressional actions to defund the medical provider based on the faulty information provided in the videos, they will then need to decide what injury or damages Planned Parenthood suffered.
Planned Parenthood’s case isn’t just about defamation, but for purposes of personal injury law, it is an interesting case to follow. Many New York personal injury attorneys will be following the case closely to see how a judge or jury determines actual malice and whether Planned Parenthood is seen as an organization or “public figure”, holding it to a higher burden of proof. Add to that the political implications and the shock value of the case rises.
Thankfully, many of us will never have to deal with such large-scale defamation, but that doesn’t mean we’re immune from local defamation. Libel and slander can damage an entrepreneur’s reputation, making it harder to earn a living. If you’ve been affected by defamation from a competitor or a vengeful former client, it’s important to seek restitution to restore your reputation. A consultation with a New York personal injury attorney can shed more light on your case and help you decide whether to move forward. It’s important to see an attorney as soon as possible after the defamation occurs to make sure you’re eligible to file a lawsuit, so call a New York personal injury lawyer today.